Portis v. Green
This text of 25 Ark. 376 (Portis v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an action upon a promissory note, executed by appellants to appellee.
Defendants in the circuit court plead that the note ivas given for a horse, and that the appellee, Green, knew that the same was to be used in the service of the Confederate States, against the Government of the United States. A demurrer to this plea having been sustained, to which ruling the defendants excepted and declined to plead over, the court rendered. judgment for the amount of the note, with interest and costs. Defendants appealed.
The case of Tatum v. Kelly, decided by this court at its last term, settled the only point in this case. Defendant’s plea was a sufficient defense, and the demurrer thereto should have been overruled. See authorities cited in the case of Kelly v. Tatum.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
25 Ark. 376, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portis-v-green-ark-1869.