Portis v. Fall

34 Ark. 375
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 34 Ark. 375 (Portis v. Fall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Portis v. Fall, 34 Ark. 375 (Ark. 1879).

Opinion

English, C. J.

William N. Portis was arrested on warrants issued by Benjamin E. Eall, a justice of the peace of Jefferson county, and other magistrates, on charges of violating the law of the state by setting up and exhibiting a gambling device called keno, within the limits of Pine Bluff.

In October, 1877, he filed a bill on the chancery side of the circuit court of Jefferson county, praying an injunction against the prosecutions, and a temporary injunction was granted.

Afterwards a demurrer was sustained to the bill; the injunction dissolved; the bill, dismissed for want of equity, and Portis appealed.

A court of equity will not exercise jurisdiction by way of injunction to stay proceedings in any criminal matters, or in any case not strictly of a civil nature. 2 Story Equity Jurisprudence (12 Ed.), sec. 893; Bispham’s Prin. Equity, sec. 424.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Karston
187 S.W.2d 327 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1945)
Jacob Hoffman Brewing Co. v. McElligott
259 F. 525 (Second Circuit, 1919)
Ferguson v. Martineau
171 S.W. 472 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1914)
Clardy v. State
131 S.W. 46 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1910)
Dreyfus v. Boone
114 S.W. 718 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
Rider v. Leatherman
107 S.W. 996 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1908)
State ex rel. Circuit Attorney v. Uhrig
14 Mo. App. 413 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 1883)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
34 Ark. 375, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/portis-v-fall-ark-1879.