Portis v. Cuummings
21 Tex. 265
Opinion
It is immaterial, for the purposes of the present suit, whether Mrs. Portis was the rightful guardian of the plaintiff or not. If not, having sued for and recovered the plaintiff's money in that character, she cannot, by disclaiming the relation of guardian, retain it; and thus take advantage of her own wrong. If a rightful guardian, now that the plaintiff is of age, her authority as guardian must cease, and she must account to her ward for his money in her hands. There manifestly is no error in the judgment, and it is affirmed
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Portis v. Cuummings, 21 Tex. 265 (Tex. 1858).
21 Tex. 265 (Portis v. Cuummings) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Guardianship of Di Carlo
44 P.2d 562 (California Supreme Court, 1935)
People ex rel. Kaiser v. Medart
63 Ill. App. 111 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1896)
Martin Brown Co. v. Perrill
13 S.W. 975 (Texas Supreme Court, 1890)
Ezell v. Edwards
2 Wilson 672 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1885)