Porting v. Treasurer of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Porting v. Treasurer of Missouri

333 S.W.3d 536, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 349

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 15, 2011·No. Nos. ED 95160, ED 95161·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, claimant appeals from two final awards of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, each affirming a separate award of the Adminis[537] trative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

In this consolidated appeal, claimant appeals from two final awards of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission, each affirming a separate award of the Adminis[537] trative Law Judge. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are supported by competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished, for their information only, with a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Porting v. Treasurer of Missouri, 333 S.W.3d 536, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 349 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

333 S.W.3d 536 (Porting v. Treasurer of Missouri) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.