Portillo (Arnoldo) v. State

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided November 12, 2014·No. 65682·Unpublished

Opinion

entered. See id. at 722, 30 P.3d at 1126 ("A thorough plea canvass coupled with a detailed, consistent, written plea agreement supports a finding that the defendant entered the plea voluntarily, knowingly, and intelligently."). We conclude that the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Riker v. State, 111 Nev. 1316, 1322, 905 P.2d 706, 710 (1995) ("On appeal from a district court's denial of a motion to withdraw a guilty plea, this court 'will presume that the lower court correctly assessed the validity of the plea, and we will not reverse the lower court's determination absent a clear showing of an abuse of discretion." (quoting Bryant v. State, 102 Nev. 268, 272, 721 P.2d 364, 368 (1986))). Accordingly, we ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

J

Hardesty

D, V/‘ J Douglas

J

cc: Hon. Douglas W. Herndon, District Judge Nguyen & Lay Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

2

(0) 1947A

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portillo (Arnoldo) v. State, (Neb. 2014).

Portillo (Arnoldo) v. State (Portillo (Arnoldo) v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bryant v. State
721 P.2d 364 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1986)
Riker v. State
905 P.2d 706 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1995)