Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Watz

381 S.W.3d 397, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2012 WL 4883195
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 16, 2012·No. No. ED 97089·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Rhonda Watz (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s judgment granting Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“Portfolio”) summary judgment on its petition against Appellant for account stated, money had and received, and breach of contract. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Watz, 381 S.W.3d 397, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1319, 2012 WL 4883195 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

381 S.W.3d 397 (Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Watz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.