Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Neal

Missouri Court of Appeals

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Neal

437 S.W.3d 368, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 569, 2014 WL 2106732

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 20, 2014·No. No. ED 96209·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danny Neal (“Neal”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) $3,487.96. Neal argues the trial court erred in that its judgment was not supported by the evidence, and it should have entered judgment as a matter of law in Neal’s favor on PRA’s petition and on his counterclaim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Danny Neal (“Neal”) appeals from the judgment of the trial court awarding Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC (“PRA”) $3,487.96. Neal argues the trial court erred in that its judgment was not supported by the evidence, and it should have entered judgment as a matter of law in Neal’s favor on PRA’s petition and on his counterclaim.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion would have no precedential value nor serve any jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Neal, 437 S.W.3d 368, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 569, 2014 WL 2106732 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

437 S.W.3d 368 (Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLC v. Neal) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.