Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Quiana Lei Porter, No. 2:20-cv-01554-KJM-DB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 Vv. Yuba City Police Department, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Quiana Porter’s application to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. See 18 | Escobedo v. Applebees, 787 F.3d 1226, 1234 (9th Cir. 2015) (“An affidavit in support of an IFP 19 | application is sufficient where it alleges that the affiant cannot pay the court costs and still afford 20 | the necessities of life.”). 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: February 17, 2021. 23 24 CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept. (Porter v. Yuba City Police Dept.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.