Porter v. . Wood
This text of 4 N.C. 226 (Porter v. . Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
It was an essential part of the plaintiff's evidence to prove his account against Lawrence, yet no witness attended for that purpose, nor does any appear to have been summoned. After so many trials, to grant a new one that the plaintiff may prepare his case, and do that which ought to have been done from the time the pleas were entered, does not seem to be proper, from any reasons laid before us.
Motion for a new trial overruled.
NOTE. — Rutledge v. Read,
(227)
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
4 N.C. 226, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-wood-nc-1815.