Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.
156 F.2d 62, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·Decided June 27, 1946·No. No. 279·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
The appellant contends that Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287 contains no provision fixing the maximum price of garments which do not have the proper minimum allowable cost. Acceptance of this contention concededly requires us to disagree with Bowles v. Biberman Bros., 3 Cir., 152 F.2d 700. We do not disagree with it. On the authority of that case judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc., 156 F.2d 62, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534 (2d Cir. 1946).
156 F.2d 62 (Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fleming v. Richter
159 F.2d 792 (Second Circuit, 1947)