Home/Second Circuit/Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.

Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.

156 F.2d 62, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedJune 27, 1946
DocketNo. 279
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 156 F.2d 62 (Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Wendee Junior, Inc., 156 F.2d 62, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534 (2d Cir. 1946).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant contends that Revised Maximum Price Regulation 287 contains no provision fixing the maximum price of garments which do not have the proper minimum allowable cost. Acceptance of this contention concededly requires us to disagree with Bowles v. Biberman Bros., 3 Cir., 152 F.2d 700. We do not disagree with it. On the authority of that case judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fleming v. Richter
159 F.2d 792 (Second Circuit, 1947)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
156 F.2d 62, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-wendee-junior-inc-ca2-1946.