Porter v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Porter v. United States

77 F. App'x 655

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 8, 2003·No. No. 03-7056·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Porter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Porter v. United States, No. CA-02-4191-6-10 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Porter, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his petition filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Porter v. United States, No. CA-02-4191-6-10 (D.S.C. May 30, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Porter v. United States, 77 F. App'x 655 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

77 F. App'x 655 (Porter v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related