Porter v. Tooke
This text of 35 Mo. 107 (Porter v. Tooke) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The petition in this case fails to state facts sufficient to constitute the cause of action for which the judgment was rendered, in that it does not appear who was the owner of the land on which the building sought to be charged with the lien was erected; and especially in that it does not appear that the building was erected under any contract with any one having any interest or ownership in the land to bo charged; and for this cause the judgment must be reversed.
Judgment reversed and cause remanded; the other judges concurring.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
35 Mo. 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-tooke-mo-1864.