Porter v. Tate Furniture Co.
This text of 68 So. 322 (Porter v. Tate Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal must he dismissed, for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain it. There is no final judgment, determining the rights of the parties litigant to this claim suit, thereby finally concluding nothing as respects the merits of the contest. Unless otherwise provided by statute, the aggrieved party’s remedy is by mandamus. — Davis v. McColloch, 391 Ala. 520, 67 South. 7001. There is no statute, of which we are aware, authorizing appeals of the character here sought to be taken.
The appeal is therefore dismissed, the appellant having merely mistaken his remedy.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
68 So. 322, 192 Ala. 9, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-tate-furniture-co-ala-1915.