Porter v. Tate Furniture Co.

68 So. 322, 192 Ala. 9, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 38
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedApril 15, 1915
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 68 So. 322 (Porter v. Tate Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Tate Furniture Co., 68 So. 322, 192 Ala. 9, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 38 (Ala. 1915).

Opinion

McCLELLAN, J.

This appeal must he dismissed, for want of jurisdiction in this court to entertain it. There is no final judgment, determining the rights of the parties litigant to this claim suit, thereby finally concluding nothing as respects the merits of the contest. Unless otherwise provided by statute, the aggrieved party’s remedy is by mandamus. — Davis v. McColloch, 391 Ala. 520, 67 South. 7001. There is no statute, of which we are aware, authorizing appeals of the character here sought to be taken.

The appeal is therefore dismissed, the appellant having merely mistaken his remedy.

Appeal dismissed.

Anderson, C. J., and Sayre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hamilton v. Harry L. Hussmann Refrigerator & Supply Co.
108 So. 43 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 So. 322, 192 Ala. 9, 1915 Ala. LEXIS 38, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-tate-furniture-co-ala-1915.