Porter v. State

335 S.W.2d 843, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3123

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 172 Tex. Crim. 366 →

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided May 11, 1960·No. No. 31810·Published

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty, is for the theft of property of the value of $55; the punishment, 5 years.

Appellant attacks the conviction and sentence because he is sentenced to serve a term in the State Penitentiary rather than in the Texas Department of Corrections.

We have held that the sentence, as here used, is valid. Riley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 328 S.W.2d 306.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular. The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIDSON, Judge.

The conviction, on a plea of guilty, is for the theft of property of the value of $55; the punishment, 5 years.

Appellant attacks the conviction and sentence because he is sentenced to serve a term in the State Penitentiary rather than in the Texas Department of Corrections.

We have held that the sentence, as here used, is valid. Riley v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 328 S.W.2d 306.

The record contains no statement of facts or bills of exception. All proceedings appear to be regular. The judgment is affirmed.

Porter v. State, 335 S.W.2d 843, 1960 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 3123 (Tex. 1960).

Pincite

335 S.W.2d 843 (Porter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Riley v. State

328 S.W.2d 306 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1959)

Opinion

Related