Porter v. State
This text of 1919 OK CR 43 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff in error, J. P. Porter, was convicted of a charge that he did keep a place 1% miles north of the town of Orr, Love county, with the intent and purpose Af selling intoxicating liquors, and his punishment was fixed at one year in the penitentiary. To reverse the judgment rendered on the verdict, an appeal was perfected. •
This is a pr^ecution u>l r section 4, < 26, Session Laws 1913, which provision of the state was, in the case of Proctor v. State, 15 Okla. Cr. 338, 176 Pac. 771, held unconstitutional and void. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Proctor Case, the judgment is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1919 OK CR 43, 177 P. 380, 15 Okla. Crim. 676, 1919 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 18, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-oklacrimapp-1919.