Porter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Porter v. State

147 P. 1191, 11 Okla. Crim. 714

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedJanuary 1, 1900

DocketNo. A-2170.

StatusPublished

This text of 147 P. 1191 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. State, 147 P. 1191, 11 Okla. Crim. 714 (Okla. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Tom Porter, was convicted at the October, 1913, term of the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of seventy-five dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The proof in the record conclusively establishes the guilt of the accused. There are no errors of law which are sufficient, in view of the facts disclosed, to warrant a reversal.

The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Tom Porter, was convicted at the October, 1913, term of the county court of Lincoln county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor with intent to sell the same, and his punishment fixed at a fine of seventy-five dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days.

The proof in the record conclusively establishes the guilt of the accused. There are no errors of law which are sufficient, in view of the facts disclosed, to warrant a reversal.

The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 P. 1191, 11 Okla. Crim. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-oklacrimapp-1900.