Porter v. State Grand Lodge Number 7

90 S.E. 281, 146 Ga. 13, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 548
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided October 18, 1916·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

1. Where the name of a corporation has been legally changed, it is suable in the new corporate name, although the alleged cause of action may have arisen before the change.

2. There was no error in refusing to grant an injunction and appoint a receiver. Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, Petition for injunction and receiver. Before Judge Brand. Clarke superior court. March 11, 1916. J. Thomas Heard, for plaintiff. Tate Wright, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. State Grand Lodge Number 7, 90 S.E. 281, 146 Ga. 13, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 548 (Ga. 1916).

90 S.E. 281 (Porter v. State Grand Lodge Number 7) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

American Bitumuls & Asphalt Company v. Homer Leggett Construction Co.
166 S.E.2d 430 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1969)