Porter v. State

196 So. 193, 142 Fla. 423, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1383
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedMarch 1, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 196 So. 193 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. State, 196 So. 193, 142 Fla. 423, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1383 (Fla. 1940).

Opinion

*424 Pee Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Whitfield, and Mr. Justice Thomas are of opinion that the judgment in this cause should be affirmed while Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Chapman are of opinion that the said judgment should be reversed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court, the judgment should be affirmed; therefore it is considered, ordered and adjudged under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 So. 193, 142 Fla. 423, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-fla-1940.