Porter v. State
This text of 174 So. 311 (Porter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 13 We entertain the view that the subjoined opinion to your inquiry by a member of your court correctly answers the inquiry, and we concur therein.
To the case of Barnewall v. Murrell,
As to whether reversible error, in the particular case, is presented in consideration of Supreme Court Rule 45, and the noted section 9509, Code, is not a question involved in your inquiry.
ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN, and FOSTER, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
174 So. 311, 234 Ala. 11, 1937 Ala. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-state-ala-1937.