Porter v. Ramberg

S.D. New York

Porter v. Ramberg

70 F. Supp. 594, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2835

DecidedMarch 28, 1947

StatusPublished

This text of 70 F. Supp. 594 (Porter v. Ramberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. Ramberg, 70 F. Supp. 594, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2835 (S.D.N.Y. 1947).

Pincite

Opinion

BYERS, District Judge.

This cause having been tried before the undersigned on December 4, 1946,1 do hereby make and state the following:

[595]*595Findings of Fact

1. During the month of March, 1946, the defendant, Catherine Ramberg, entered into an oral agreement with one Gertrude Watkins for the occupancy of a 4-room bungalow located on Lake Drive, New City Park, Rockland County, New York, from May 1, 1946, for the summer season of 1946, at the agreed .rental of $300 for the said season; it was further agreed between the parties that occupancy on the part of the tenant and her family might extend beyond the summer season for a period of not to exceed three months after Labor Day of 1946, without the payment of additional rental.

2. The said bungalow was rented as a furnished habitation, and was so occupied by the said Gertrude Watkins and her family, and said occupancy continued to and including October 14, 1946, when the order to show cause signed by Judge Mandelbaum was procured.

3. On or about September 17, 1946, the defendant instituted a dispossess proceeding in the Justice’s Court in Clarkstown, Rock-land County, New York, for the purpose of securing possession of the demised premises.

4. Such dispossess proceeding was carried to a conclusion, and a judgment of eviction was entered by default on or about October 1, 1946.

5. No notice was sent to the Area Rent Office of the Office of Price Administration prior to the initiation of the said dispossess proceeding.

6. The plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of proof that said tenancy of the premises referred to in Finding 1 hereof was for more than the summer season of 1946 as it was recognized and measured according to the uses and practices prevailing in the community in which the said bungalow was located, and as extended by the mutual understanding of the parties for a period not to exceed three months after Labor Day of September, 1946.

Conclusion of Law

The defendant’s motion for the dismissal of the complaint must be granted, and judgment accordingly is hereby ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BYERS, District Judge.

This cause having been tried before the undersigned on December 4, 1946,1 do hereby make and state the following:

[595]*595Findings of Fact

1. During the month of March, 1946, the defendant, Catherine Ramberg, entered into an oral agreement with one Gertrude Watkins for the occupancy of a 4-room bungalow located on Lake Drive, New City Park, Rockland County, New York, from May 1, 1946, for the summer season of 1946, at the agreed .rental of $300 for the said season; it was further agreed between the parties that occupancy on the part of the tenant and her family might extend beyond the summer season for a period of not to exceed three months after Labor Day of 1946, without the payment of additional rental.

2. The said bungalow was rented as a furnished habitation, and was so occupied by the said Gertrude Watkins and her family, and said occupancy continued to and including October 14, 1946, when the order to show cause signed by Judge Mandelbaum was procured.

3. On or about September 17, 1946, the defendant instituted a dispossess proceeding in the Justice’s Court in Clarkstown, Rock-land County, New York, for the purpose of securing possession of the demised premises.

4. Such dispossess proceeding was carried to a conclusion, and a judgment of eviction was entered by default on or about October 1, 1946.

5. No notice was sent to the Area Rent Office of the Office of Price Administration prior to the initiation of the said dispossess proceeding.

6. The plaintiff has failed to sustain his burden of proof that said tenancy of the premises referred to in Finding 1 hereof was for more than the summer season of 1946 as it was recognized and measured according to the uses and practices prevailing in the community in which the said bungalow was located, and as extended by the mutual understanding of the parties for a period not to exceed three months after Labor Day of September, 1946.

Conclusion of Law

The defendant’s motion for the dismissal of the complaint must be granted, and judgment accordingly is hereby ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

70 F. Supp. 594, 1947 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2835, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-ramberg-nysd-1947.