Porter v. Porter

• Court: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
• Decided: November 5, 2014
• Docket: 2014-UP-368
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR.

THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Alfreda G. Porter, Respondent,

v.

Ernest J. Porter, Jr., Appellant.

Appellate Case No. 2013-000484

Appeal From Sumter County Dorothy Mobley Jones, Family Court Judge

Unpublished Opinion No. 2014-UP-368 Submitted August 1, 2014 – Filed November 5, 2014

AFFIRMED

Charles Thomas Brooks, III, of Law Office of Charles T. Brooks, III, of Sumter, for Appellant.

Kenneth R. Young, Jr., of Sumter, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Sanderson v. Sanderson, 391 S.C. 249, 255, 705 S.E.2d 65, 67-68 (Ct. App. 2010) (stating to be preserved for appellate review, an issue must have been (1) raised to and ruled upon by the trial court; (2) raised by the appellant; (3) raised in a timely manner; and (4) raised to the trial court with sufficient specificity (citing S.C. Dep't of Transp. v. First Carolina Corp. of S.C., 372 S.C. 295, 301-02, 641 S.E.2d 903, 907 (2007))); Hickman v. Hickman, 301 S.C. 455, 456, 392 S.E.2d 481, 482 (Ct. App. 1990) ("A party cannot use Rule 59(e) to present to the [family] court an issue the party could have raised prior to judgment but did not.").

AFFIRMED.1

FEW, C.J., and THOMAS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

1 We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR.