Porter v. Porter
174 S.E. 527, 178 Ga. 784, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 183
Opinion
The evidence showing without dispute that the defendant was financially unable to pay the sum awarded as alimony and attorney’s fees, it was error to adjudge that he was in contempt of court because of his failure to pay the same. Pinckard v. Pinckard, 23 Ga. 286; Davis v. Davis, 138 Ga. 8 (74 S. E. 830) ; Potter v. Potter, 145 Ga. 60 (88 S. E. 546) ; Lightfoot v. Lightfoot, 149 Ga. 213 (99 S. E. 611).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Porter v. Porter, 174 S.E. 527, 178 Ga. 784, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 183 (Ga. 1934).
174 S.E. 527 (Porter v. Porter) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Robertson v. Robertson
63 S.E.2d 876 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1951)
Boyett v. Boyett
15 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Acker v. Adamson
293 N.W. 83 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1940)
Snider v. Snider
9 S.E.2d 654 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)
Reese v. Reese
5 S.E.2d 777 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Banks v. Banks
3 S.E.2d 717 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1939)
Scruggs v. Scruggs
193 S.E. 865 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1937)
Lopez v. Maes
37 P.2d 240 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1934)