Porter v. Peterson

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 308
Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided October 30, 1723·Published

Opinion

It is this day consented and agreed by and between Benjamin Whitaker Esq. of the Complainant’s Counsel and William Blakewey Esq. of the Defendants Counsel, that a certain Exhibit remaining in the hands of the Examiner of this Court, intituled, “the humble Petition of Mary Porter” and markt (A) be admitted; that it was preferred to Governour Johnson in Council; and that the Reference thereon, was written by Francis Yonge Esq.; And Ordered by consent of the said Parties Complainant and Defendants Counsel in Court, and Sollicitors, that Publication do pass in this Cause forthwith.

Intr.

Tho. Lamboll Deputy Register

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. Peterson, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 308 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1723).

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 308 (Porter v. Peterson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.