Porter v. Pennsylvania Railroad
This text of 232 A.D. 867 (Porter v. Pennsylvania Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed on the law and facts, and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, unless plaintiff within ten days stipulates to reduce the verdict to the sum of $4,500 as of the date of the rendition thereof, in which event the judgment is modified accordingly, and as so modified is, together with the order, affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. This decision is on the ground that the finding of the jury that all [868]*868of the damage to the grapes occurred after the negligence of defendant, in failing to notify plaintiff of Morinelli’s non-acceptance, began to operate, is contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. All concur. Present — Sears, P. J., Crouch, Taylor, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
232 A.D. 867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-pennsylvania-railroad-nyappdiv-1931.