Porter v. Parker

126 S.E. 381, 159 Ga. 556, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 20
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 15, 1925·No. Nos. 4591, 4592·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gilbert, J.

1. “Demurrers, pleas, and answers should be disposed of in the order named. A demurrer should be determined before the case is submitted on the issues made by the pleadings, although the demurrant and his counsel be absent without leave.” But the failure to dispose of the demurrer in the present case is not such an irregularity as will require a new trial. Anderson v. Fulton County Home Builders, 147 Ga. 104 (92 S. E. 934).

2. It is not shown that the court erred in proceeding with the trial of the cases in the absence of complainant’s counsel.

[557] Nos. 4591, 4592. January 15, 1925.

3. The evidence, which was without conflict in both eases, demanded the verdicts as directed by the court.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur. James W. Arnold, for plaintiffs in error. Noel P. Parle, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. Parker, 126 S.E. 381, 159 Ga. 556, 1925 Ga. LEXIS 20 (Ga. 1925).

126 S.E. 381 (Porter v. Parker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prudential Timber & Farm Co. v. Collins
243 S.E.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1978)
Caylor v. Wheat
80 S.E.2d 688 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1954)
Hull v. District Court of San Juan
42 P.R. 146 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1931)
Hull v. Corte de Distrito de San Juan
42 P.R. Dec. 151 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1931)
Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. Jolly
127 S.E. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1925)