Porter v. Montgomery County Government
This text of 141 F. App'x 193 (Porter v. Montgomery County Government) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Edgar M. Porter appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed the amended supplemental complaint because Porter only made general, non-fact-specific allegations of racial bias. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Porter v. Montgomery County, No. CA-05-75DKC (D. Md. filed Mar. 15, 2005; entered Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
141 F. App'x 193, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-montgomery-county-government-ca4-2005.