Porter v. Montgomery County Government

Fourth Circuit

Porter v. Montgomery County Government

141 F. App'x 193

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 28, 2005·No. No. 05-1424·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Edgar M. Porter appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed the amended supplemental complaint because Porter only made general, non-fact-specific allegations of racial bias. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Porter v. Montgomery County, No. CA-05-75DKC (D. Md. filed Mar. 15, 2005; entered Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Edgar M. Porter appeals a district court order dismissing without prejudice his civil rights complaint. The district court dismissed the amended supplemental complaint because Porter only made general, non-fact-specific allegations of racial bias. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s order and affirm for the reasons cited by the district court. See Porter v. Montgomery County, No. CA-05-75DKC (D. Md. filed Mar. 15, 2005; entered Mar. 16, 2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Porter v. Montgomery County Government, 141 F. App'x 193 (4th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

141 F. App'x 193 (Porter v. Montgomery County Government) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.