Porter v. Korpri

538 F. App'x 334
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 27, 2013
DocketNo. 13-6822
StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 334 (Porter v. Korpri) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Korpri, 538 F. App'x 334 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeffery Edward Porter appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil rights action for failure to state a claim. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2006). On appeal, we confíne our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Porter’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Porter has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

§ 1915A
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-korpri-ca4-2013.