Porter v. Knapp, O'Connell

Montana Supreme Court

Porter v. Knapp, O'Connell

214 P.2d 765, 123 Mont. 614, 1950 Mont. LEXIS 64

CourtMontana Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 4, 1950

DocketNo. 8950.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 214 P.2d 765 (Porter v. Knapp, O'Connell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. Knapp, O'Connell, 214 P.2d 765, 123 Mont. 614, 1950 Mont. LEXIS 64 (Mo. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, Boger Porter, by and through his attorney of record, Stanley M. Doyle, Esq., having this day filed herein a praecipe for an order dismissing the above numbered and entitled cause of action, on the ground and for the reason that the defendants, and all of them, have cancelled and withdrawn their proposed emergency appropriation, being the subject of said action, and the court having duly considered such praecipe, it is ordered that this action be dismissed forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The plaintiff, Boger Porter, by and through his attorney of record, Stanley M. Doyle, Esq., having this day filed herein a praecipe for an order dismissing the above numbered and entitled cause of action, on the ground and for the reason that the defendants, and all of them, have cancelled and withdrawn their proposed emergency appropriation, being the subject of said action, and the court having duly considered such praecipe, it is ordered that this action be dismissed forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 P.2d 765, 123 Mont. 614, 1950 Mont. LEXIS 64, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-knapp-oconnell-mont-1950.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack