Porter v. Jackson

Indiana Supreme Court

Porter v. Jackson

15 Ind. 97, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 302

DecidedNovember 28, 1860

StatusPublished

This text of 15 Ind. 97 (Porter v. Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. Jackson, 15 Ind. 97, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 302 (Ind. 1860).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Guriam.

This was an action by Jackson against Porter, as a surgeon, for malpractice. Verdict for the plaintiff. New trial refused, and judgment. The error, upon which the appellant relies for a reversal, is that the verdict is unsustained by the evidence. The evidence is in the record, and we have examined it carefully, and are of opinion that the verdict accords with its weight.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Guriam.

This was an action by Jackson against Porter, as a surgeon, for malpractice. Verdict for the plaintiff. New trial refused, and judgment. The error, upon which the appellant relies for a reversal, is that the verdict is unsustained by the evidence. The evidence is in the record, and we have examined it carefully, and are of opinion that the verdict accords with its weight.

The judgment is affirmed, with 2 per cent, damages and costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

15 Ind. 97, 1860 Ind. LEXIS 302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-jackson-ind-1860.