Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Porter v. Goord

Porter v. Goord

270 A.D.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3651
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 29, 2000
StatusPublished

This text of 270 A.D.2d 874 (Porter v. Goord) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Goord, 270 A.D.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3651 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

—Determination unanimously confirmed without costs and petition dismissed. Memorandum: The positive results of the EMIT tests constitute substantial evidence supporting the Hearing Officer’s determination that petitioner violated inmate rule 113.24 (7 NYCRR 270.2 [B] [14] [xv] [using drugs]; see, Matter of Lahey v Kelly, 71 NY2d 135). We reject petitioner’s contention that the Hearing Officer failed to act in a fair and impartial manner (see, Matter of Hooper v Goord, 247 AD2d 884). (CPLR art 78 Proceeding Transferred by Order of Supreme Court, Wyoming County, Dadd, J.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Hurl-butt and Kehoe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lahey v. Kelly
518 N.E.2d 924 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
Hooper v. Goord
247 A.D.2d 884 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
270 A.D.2d 874, 705 N.Y.S.2d 909, 2000 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3651, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-goord-nyappdiv-2000.