Porter v. Friedman

Ninth Circuit

Porter v. Friedman

154 F.2d 1021, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2155

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedApril 3, 1946

DocketNo. 11184

StatusPublished

This text of 154 F.2d 1021 (Porter v. Friedman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. Friedman, 154 F.2d 1021, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2155 (9th Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the judgment in this cause insofar as it denies recovery to the plaintiff under Count Four of the complaint be, and hereby is reversed, and that judgment in favor of the plaintiff may be limited to single the amount of the overcharge, that a judgment be filed and entered in this Court and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the stipulation of counsel for the respective parties, and good cause therefor appearing, it is ordered that the judgment in this cause insofar as it denies recovery to the plaintiff under Count Four of the complaint be, and hereby is reversed, and that judgment in favor of the plaintiff may be limited to single the amount of the overcharge, that a judgment be filed and entered in this Court and that the mandate of this Court in this cause issue forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 F.2d 1021, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-friedman-ca9-1946.