Porter v. County of Solano

District Court, E.D. California·Decided May 30, 2025·No. 2:21-cv-01473·Unknown

Opinion

Nakia Porter et al., No. 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP Plaintiffs, ORDER v. County of Solano et al., IS Defendants. The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint request for this court to maintain continuing jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement reached by the plaintiffs and defendant Roy Stockton. ECF No. 230. The court in its discretion declines to maintain jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994); cf Collins v. Thompson, 8 F.3d 657, 659 (9th Cir.1993). Unless there is some independent basis for federal jurisdiction, enforcement of the agreement is for the state courts. Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 382. This order resolves ECF No. 230. DATED: 5/29/2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. County of Solano, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Porter v. County of Solano (Porter v. County of Solano) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America
511 U.S. 375 (Supreme Court, 1994)