Porter v. County of Solano

E.D. California

Porter v. County of Solano

DecidedMay 30, 2025

Docket2:21-cv-01473

StatusUnknown

This text of Porter v. County of Solano (Porter v. County of Solano) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter v. County of Solano, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Nakia Porter et al., No. 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. County of Solano et al., IS Defendants. 16 17 The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint request for this court to maintain continuing 18 | jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement reached by the plaintiffs and 19 | defendant Roy Stockton. ECF No. 230. The court in its discretion declines to maintain 20 | jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life 21 | Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994); cf Collins v. 22 | Thompson, 8 F.3d 657, 659 (9th Cir.1993). Unless there is some independent basis for federal 23 | jurisdiction, enforcement of the agreement is for the state courts. Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 382. 24 This order resolves ECF No. 230. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: 5/29/2025

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Nakia Porter et al., No. 2:21-cv-01473-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER 13 v. County of Solano et al., IS Defendants. 16 17 The court is in receipt of the parties’ joint request for this court to maintain continuing 18 | jurisdiction over the enforcement of the settlement agreement reached by the plaintiffs and 19 | defendant Roy Stockton. ECF No. 230. The court in its discretion declines to maintain 20 | jurisdiction to enforce the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life 21 | Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381, 114 S. Ct. 1673, 128 L.Ed.2d 391 (1994); cf Collins v. 22 | Thompson, 8 F.3d 657, 659 (9th Cir.1993). Unless there is some independent basis for federal 23 | jurisdiction, enforcement of the agreement is for the state courts. Kokkonen, 511 U.S. at 382. 24 This order resolves ECF No. 230. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 DATED: 5/29/2025

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Porter v. County of Solano, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-county-of-solano-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack