PORTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
This text of PORTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY (PORTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA C.P., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. ) 3:25-cv-00037-TES-AGH FRANK BISIGNANO, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) CONSENT ORDER Under sentence four of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), this Court has the authority to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner’s decision with remand. The Commissioner requests that the Court remand this case to the agency for further consideration and administrative action. On remand, the agency will offer the claimant an opportunity for an additional hearing and issue a new decision. The Commissioner’s unopposed motion is GRANTED, and this case is hereby REMANDED. Therefore, this Court hereby reverses the Commissioner's decision under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner for further proceedings. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 98 (1991). The clerk of the court will enter a separate judgment pursuant to Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. IT IS SO ORDERED, July 3, 2025. S/ Tilman E. Self, III ______________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Presented by: Timothy C. Stevens Georgia Bar No. 940629 Special Assistant United States Attorney
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
PORTER v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-commissioner-of-social-security-gamd-2025.