Porter v. City of New York

163 A.D. 866
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Porter v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 158 A.D. 604

Opinion

This court is of opinion that plaintiff should be allowed to establish whatever cause of action she may have, whether it be under the Labor Law or at common law, entirely unaffected by the provisions of the Labor Law. We think, therefore, that her motion for leave to serve the proposed amended complaint should have been granted on appropriate terms. Order reverse'd, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion for leave to serve an amended complaint granted on condition that within twenty days plaintiff pay to defendant the full taxable costs in this action, including the costs and disbursements on the former appeal (Reported in 158 App. Div. 604.) Jenks, P. J., Burr, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. City of New York, 163 A.D. 866 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

163 A.D. 866 (Porter v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. City of New York
158 A.D. 604 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1913)