Porter v. Attorney General

593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 875, 2010 WL 117704
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 14, 2010
Docket07-12976
StatusPublished

This text of 593 F.3d 1275 (Porter v. Attorney General) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porter v. Attorney General, 593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 875, 2010 WL 117704 (11th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CARNES, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the District Court for pro-

Porter’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was granted by the District Court. We reversed. Porter v. Att’y Gen., 552 F.3d 1260, 1262 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Porter v. McCollum,, 558 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 447, 456, — L.Ed.2d -(2009) (per curiam.). ceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Porter v. McCollum
558 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Porter v. Attorney General
552 F.3d 1260 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 875, 2010 WL 117704, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-v-attorney-general-ca11-2010.