Porter v. Attorney General

593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 875, 2010 WL 117704
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided January 14, 2010·No. 07-12976·Published

Opinion

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

Before CARNES, WILSON and PRYOR, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Accordingly, the judgment of the District Court is affirmed, and the case is remanded to the District Court for pro-

Porter’s application for a writ of habeas corpus was granted by the District Court. We reversed. Porter v. Att’y Gen., 552 F.3d 1260, 1262 (11th Cir.2008) (per curiam). The Supreme Court granted certiorari, reversed our decision, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with its opinion. Porter v. McCollum,, 558 U.S. -, 130 S.Ct. 447, 456, — L.Ed.2d -(2009) (per curiam.). ceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porter v. Attorney General, 593 F.3d 1275, 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 875, 2010 WL 117704 (11th Cir. 2010).

593 F.3d 1275 (Porter v. Attorney General) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Porter v. McCollum
558 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 2009)
Porter v. Attorney General
552 F.3d 1260 (Eleventh Circuit, 2008)