Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

Nevada Supreme Court

Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)

DecidedAugust 29, 2019

Docket79367

StatusPublished

This text of Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State) (Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), (Neb. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JUSTIN D. PORTER, No. 79367 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, AUG 2 9 2g19 Respondent, TIOWN PRELI COURT and r 5

DEPUTY C. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which petitioner contends that he has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial on charges pending against him. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

Pieko..7 , J. / A eta-41;\ ,

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Justin D. Porter Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

10) 1947A .00. 2 - :(17:..11111:1 1

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

JUSTIN D. PORTER, No. 79367 Petitioner, vs. THE EIGHTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA, FILED IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF CLARK, AUG 2 9 2g19 Respondent, TIOWN PRELI COURT and r 5

DEPUTY C. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Real Party in Interest.

ORDER DENYING PETITION

This is an original pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus in which petitioner contends that he has been deprived of his right to a speedy trial on charges pending against him. Problematically, petitioner has not provided this court with exhibits or other documentation that would support his claims for relief. See NRAP 21(a)(4) (providing the petitioner shall submit an appendix containing all documents "essential to understand the matters set forth in the petition"). Therefore, without deciding on the merits of the claims raised, we decline to exercise our original jurisdiction in this matter, see NRS 34.160; NRAP 21(b); Pan v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Court, 120 Nev. 222, 228,

SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A 88 P.3d 840, 844 (2004) CPetitioned cardies] the burden of demonstrating that extraordinary relief is warranted."). Accordingly, we ORDER the petition DENIED.

Gibbons

Pieko..7 , J. / A eta-41;\ ,

Pickering Hardesty

cc: Justin D. Porter Attorney General/Carson City Clark County District Attorney Eighth District Court Clerk

10) 1947A .00. 2 - :(17:..11111:1 1

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Porter (Justin) Vs. Dist. Ct. (State), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-justin-vs-dist-ct-state-nev-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack