Porter ex rel. Porter v. Jarrell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Porter ex rel. Porter v. Jarrell

130 S.E.2d 884, 259 N.C. 505, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 583

DecidedMay 22, 1963

StatusPublished

This text of 130 S.E.2d 884 (Porter ex rel. Porter v. Jarrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porter ex rel. Porter v. Jarrell, 130 S.E.2d 884, 259 N.C. 505, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 583 (N.C. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence, though conflicting in part, nevertheless was sufficient to go to the jury on the simple issues presented. The court sufficiently charged with respect to the rights and duties of the parties. The jury’s resolution of the disputed facts is conclusive. The record discloses neither valid reason to send the case back, nor likli-hood that another hearing would produce a substantially different result.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence, though conflicting in part, nevertheless was sufficient to go to the jury on the simple issues presented. The court sufficiently charged with respect to the rights and duties of the parties. The jury’s resolution of the disputed facts is conclusive. The record discloses neither valid reason to send the case back, nor likli-hood that another hearing would produce a substantially different result.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 S.E.2d 884, 259 N.C. 505, 1963 N.C. LEXIS 583, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porter-ex-rel-porter-v-jarrell-nc-1963.