Portec, Inc. v. Post Office
499 U.S. 915, 111 S. Ct. 1299, 113 L. Ed. 2d 235, 59 U.S.L.W. 3635, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1699
Opinion
C. A. 10th Cir. Certiorari granted, judgment vacated, and case remanded for further consideration in light of Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Haslip, ante, p. 1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Portec, Inc. v. Post Office, 499 U.S. 915, 111 S. Ct. 1299, 113 L. Ed. 2d 235, 59 U.S.L.W. 3635, 1991 U.S. LEXIS 1699 (1991).
499 U.S. 915 (Portec, Inc. v. Post Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.
205 F.3d 1219 (Tenth Circuit, 2000)
James S. Bishop, D/B/A Essence of Life, and Cross-Appellee v. Equinox International Corp., a Nevada Corporation, And
154 F.3d 1220 (Tenth Circuit, 1998)
United Phosphorus, Ltd. v. Midland Fumigant, Inc.
21 F. Supp. 2d 1255 (D. Kansas, 1998)
Universal Motor Oils Co., Inc. v. Amoco Oil Co.
809 F. Supp. 816 (D. Kansas, 1992)
Green v. Johnson
977 F.2d 1383 (Tenth Circuit, 1992)
Alexander & Alexander, Inc. v. B. Dixon Evander & Associates, Inc.
596 A.2d 687 (Court of Special Appeals of Maryland, 1991)
Robertson Oil Company, Inc. v. Phillips Petroleum Company
930 F.2d 1342 (Eighth Circuit, 1991)