Porta v. Muratschew

93 A.D.3d 850, 940 N.Y.S.2d 897
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 27, 2012·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In a child custody proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 6, the father appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the [851]*851Family Court, Rockland County (Warren, J.), entered June 14, 2011, as, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to a prior determination in an order of the same court dated February 15, 2011, dismissing so much of the petition as sought to adjudicate the mother in contempt of an order of the same court entered April 30, 2008.

Ordered that the order entered June 14, 2011, is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

Under the circumstances of this case, the Family Court properly, in effect, upon reargument, adhered to an original determination dismissing so much of the petition as sought to adjudicate the mother in contempt of a prior order entered April 30, 2008. Rivera, J.E, Leventhal, Roman and Cohen, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Porta v. Muratschew, 93 A.D.3d 850, 940 N.Y.S.2d 897 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

93 A.D.3d 850 (Porta v. Muratschew) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

St. Hill v. Babb
99 A.D.3d 1009 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)