Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt

101 S.E. 766, 24 Ga. App. 650, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 427

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 6, 1920

Docket10607, 10608

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 101 S.E. 766 (Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Port Wentworth Terminal Corp. v. Leavitt, 101 S.E. 766, 24 Ga. App. 650, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 427 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

1. A demurrer which is general and attacks the petition as a whole is properly overruled if any part of the petition sets out a legal cause of action. See Hudson v. Hudson, 119 Ga. 637 (1) (46 S. E. 874). The petition in this case was not subject to the motion to dismiss upon the grounds of misjoinder of causes, nor subject to the demurrers urged against it.

2. The motion attacking the plea of the defendant, upon the grounds thereof and as presented, is without merit. The court did not err in overruling the demurrers to the suit, nor in overruling the motion to strike the defendant’s answer.

Judgment affirmed on hoth the mam hill of exceptions and the cross-hill.

Broyles, O. J., amd Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI