Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.

31 A. 950, 168 Pa. 19, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 752

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 6, 1895

DocketAppeal, No. 91

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 31 A. 950 (Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Port v. Huntingdon & Broad Top R. R., 31 A. 950, 168 Pa. 19, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 752 (Pa. 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

An examination of this record with special reference to the specifications, discloses no substantial error. The questions involved, — so far as they are material, — have been sufficiently considered and correctly decided by the learned president of the common pleas. It is unnecessary to add anything to what has been said by him in his opinion on the questions of law reserved, etc., and on that opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

An examination of this record with special reference to the specifications, discloses no substantial error. The questions involved, — so far as they are material, — have been sufficiently considered and correctly decided by the learned president of the common pleas. It is unnecessary to add anything to what has been said by him in his opinion on the questions of law reserved, etc., and on that opinion the judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 A. 950, 168 Pa. 19, 1895 Pa. LEXIS 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-v-huntingdon-broad-top-r-r-pa-1895.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack