Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad
24 N.Y.S. 566, 71 Hun 179
Opinion
We think the seventh finding of fact is sustained by the evidence. From that it follows that no agreement was reached between the companies as to the crossing. If plaintiff cannot make a satisfactory arrangement, 'it must apply under the railroad act,1 which we believe to be applicable. Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad, 24 N.Y.S. 566, 71 Hun 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).
24 N.Y.S. 566 (Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Matter of Stillwater M. St. Ry. Co.
64 N.E. 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Stillwater & Mechanicville Street Railway Co. v. Boston & Maine Railroad
171 N.Y. 589 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Connolly v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
35 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)