Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad
This text of 78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179 (Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We think the seventh finding of fact is sustained by the evidence. From that it follows that no agreement was reached between the companies as to the crossing.
If plaintiff cannot make a satisfactory arrangement it must apply under the Railroad Act, which we believe to be applicable.
The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-richmond-prohibition-park-electric-railroad-v-staten-island-rapid-nysupct-1893.