Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad

78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 319
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1893
StatusPublished

This text of 78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179 (Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad, 78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 319 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

Opinion

Pratt, J.:

We think the seventh finding of fact is sustained by the evidence. From that it follows that no agreement was reached between the companies as to the crossing.

If plaintiff cannot make a satisfactory arrangement it must apply under the Railroad Act, which we believe to be applicable.

The judgment must be affirmed, with costs.

Barnard, P. J., concurred; Dykman, J., not sitting.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 179, 54 N.Y. St. Rep. 319, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-richmond-prohibition-park-electric-railroad-v-staten-island-rapid-nysupct-1893.