Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad

24 N.Y.S. 566, 71 Hun 179
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 28, 1893·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PRATT, J.

We think the seventh finding of fact is sustained by the evidence. From that it follows that no agreement was reached between the companies as to the crossing. If plaintiff cannot make a satisfactory arrangement, 'it must apply under the railroad act,1 which we believe to be applicable. Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad, 24 N.Y.S. 566, 71 Hun 179 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

24 N.Y.S. 566 (Port Richmond & Prohibition Park Electric Railroad v. Staten Island Rapid Transit Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Stillwater M. St. Ry. Co.
64 N.E. 511 (New York Court of Appeals, 1902)
Connolly v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
35 A.D. 609 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1898)