Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Rude
This text of 77 N.W. 177 (Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Rude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The plaintiff entered judgment against the defendants upon judgment notes, and the defendants moved upon affidavits and a verified answer to vacate the judgment, and for leave to plead. The motion was heard upon affidavits, and the court opened the default and allowed the answer to be served, but allowed the judgment to stand as security, and refused to order a reference of the questions of fact arising on the motion as asked for by the plaintiff. From that part of the order opening the default and refusing the reference the plaintiff appealed.
[325]*325Upon the authority of the case of Ledebuhr v. Grand Grove, 97 Wis. 341, the order in question must be held not appeal-able. It is not appealable under subd. 1, sec. 3009, Stats. 1898, because it does not determine the action, nor prevent a judgment from which an appeal may be taken. Neither is it appealable under subd. 2 of the same section, because it is not a final order after judgment. As said in the case cited: “ It concludes nothing; it leaves everything open for future proceedings and investigation.” Had the motion been denied, then the order would clearly have been a final order, as held in the case of Purcell v. Kleaver, 98 Wis. 102, and hence appealable.
By the Gourt.— Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 N.W. 177, 101 Wis. 324, 1898 Wisc. LEXIS 313, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-huron-engine-thresher-co-v-rude-wis-1898.