Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co.

104 N.E. 1139, 210 N.Y. 616, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1379
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 10, 1914
StatusPublished

This text of 104 N.E. 1139 (Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Port Huron Engine & Thresher Co. v. Baldwin Contracting Co., 104 N.E. 1139, 210 N.Y. 616, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1379 (N.Y. 1914).

Opinion

The jury had a right, under the evidence, to find that the Acme Company indorsed the notes solely for the purpose of transferring title thereto to the plaintiff and for its accommodation. The giving of the notes by the Baldwin Company did not prevent it from asserting and proving its counterclaim, and the question of pleading was not sufficiently raised to prevent its counterclaim being considered.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to each defendant.

Concur: Willard Bartlett, Oh. J., Hiscocit, Chare, Cuddeback, Hogan, Miller and Cardozo, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 N.E. 1139, 210 N.Y. 616, 1914 N.Y. LEXIS 1379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/port-huron-engine-thresher-co-v-baldwin-contracting-co-ny-1914.