Port Bay Associates v. Soundview Shopping Center
225 A.D.2d 601, 639 N.Y.2d 741, 639 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2226
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Port Bay Associates v. Soundview Shopping Center. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 A.D.2d 848 →
Opinion
Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed, as the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248); and it is further,
Ordered that the order and judgment entered June 17, 1994, is affirmed, for reasons stated by Justice Winick at the Supreme Court in his undated short form order; and it is further,
Ordered that the respondents are awarded one bill of costs. Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Sullivan, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Port Bay Associates v. Soundview Shopping Center, 225 A.D.2d 601, 639 N.Y.2d 741, 639 N.Y.S.2d 741, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2226 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).
225 A.D.2d 601 (Port Bay Associates v. Soundview Shopping Center) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In re Aho
347 N.E.2d 647 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)