Porro v. Porro

498 So. 2d 1065, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11073
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 19, 1986
DocketNo. 4-86-2413
StatusPublished

This text of 498 So. 2d 1065 (Porro v. Porro) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Porro v. Porro, 498 So. 2d 1065, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1986).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the finding of contempt because we believe the appellant was entitled to testify on her own behalf at the contempt hearing. Our reversal, of course, is without prejudice to the continuation of this contempt proceeding or any other proceedings to support the court’s orders concerning child custody and visitation.

ANSTEAD, LETTS and GLICKSTEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
498 So. 2d 1065, 1986 Fla. App. LEXIS 11073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porro-v-porro-fladistctapp-1986.