Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

D. Arizona

Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

DecidedMarch 22, 2023

Docket4:22-cv-00022

StatusUnknown

This text of Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, (D. Ariz. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Steven Porrier, ) No. CV 22-22-TUC-JAS (BGM) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 13 ) Defendant. ) 14 ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 19 As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s 21 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 22 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 23 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25 (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) is accepted and 26 adopted. 27 (2) The decision of the ALJ is reversed and this case is remanded for the immediate 28 calculation and award of benefits. 1 |] (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. ; Dated this 22nd day of March, 2023. 5 7 | ro Aico ° Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Steven Porrier, ) No. CV 22-22-TUC-JAS (BGM) ) 10 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ) 11 vs. ) ) 12 ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) 13 ) Defendant. ) 14 ) ) 15 16 Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation issued by United States 17 Magistrate Judge Macdonald. A review of the record reflects that the parties have not filed 18 any objections to the Report and Recommendation and the time to file objections has expired. 19 As such, the Court will not consider any objections or new evidence. 20 The Court has reviewed the record and concludes that Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s 21 recommendations are not clearly erroneous. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72; 22 Johnson v. Zema Systems Corp., 170 F.3d 734, 739 (7th Cir. 1999); Conley v. Crabtree, 14 23 F. Supp. 2d 1203, 1204 (D. Or. 1998). 24 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 25 (1) Magistrate Judge Macdonald’s Report and Recommendation (Doc. 26) is accepted and 26 adopted. 27 (2) The decision of the ALJ is reversed and this case is remanded for the immediate 28 calculation and award of benefits. 1 |] (3) The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment and close the file in this case. ; Dated this 22nd day of March, 2023. 5 7 | ro Aico ° Honorable James A. Soto 10 United States District Judge 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Porrier v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porrier-v-commissioner-of-social-security-administration-azd-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack