Poroznoff v. Alberti

401 A.2d 1124, 168 N.J. Super. 140
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedMay 15, 1979
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 401 A.2d 1124 (Poroznoff v. Alberti) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Poroznoff v. Alberti, 401 A.2d 1124, 168 N.J. Super. 140 (N.J. Ct. App. 1979).

Opinion

168 N.J. Super. 140 (1979)
401 A.2d 1124

PAUL POROZNOFF, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,
v.
JOSEPH ALBERTI, RONALD R. GRAHAM, AND PASSAIC Y.M.C.A., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Submitted May 7, 1979.
Decided May 15, 1979.

*141 Before Judges ALLCORN, SEIDMAN and BOTTER.

Ms. Madeline L. Houston, of the Passaic County Legal Aid Society, attorney for appellant.

Mr. Nicholas Martini, attorney for respondents (Mr. Sam Weiss, of counsel).

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff appeals from the denial of his request for an order returning him to possession of his room at the Passaic Y.M.C.A. and damages. The reasons for the trial judge's denial of relief and dismissal of the action are stated in his written opinion, 161 N.J. Super. 414 (Cty. D. Ct. 1978).

Plaintiff's assertion on this appeal that he occupied a room at the Passaic Y.M.C.A. as his only residence is insufficient *142 to establish that he was not a transient guest within the meaning of N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1. There is no basis for concluding that plaintiff and defendants entered into a tenancy that gave plaintiff a legal status other than that of a transient guest residing on a week-to-week basis at the Passaic Y.M.C.A., which plaintiff conceded to be a hotel for the purposes of this case. The protections afforded by N.J.S.A. 2A:18-61.1 expressly do not apply to transient or seasonal tenants residing at a hotel, motel or other guest house. Thus, we concur in the conclusion of the trial judge that plaintiff failed to establish a claim for being locked out of his room at the Y.M.C.A. without defendants having first obtained a judgment of possession pursuant to N.J.S.A. 2A:18-53.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Starns v. American Baptist Estates of Red Bank
800 A.2d 182 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 2002)
McNeill v. Estate of Lachmann
666 A.2d 996 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Francis v. Trinidad Motel
618 A.2d 873 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1993)
Williams v. Alexander Hamilton Hotel
592 A.2d 644 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)
Vasquez v. Glassboro Service Ass'n, Inc.
415 A.2d 1156 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
401 A.2d 1124, 168 N.J. Super. 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/poroznoff-v-alberti-njsuperctappdiv-1979.