Porotsky v. Seroush

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Porotsky v. Seroush

147 A.D.2d 426, 538 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 28, 1989

StatusPublished

This text of 147 A.D.2d 426 (Porotsky v. Seroush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Porotsky v. Seroush, 147 A.D.2d 426, 538 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.), entered on or about December 21,1987, which, inter alia, granted defendants-respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action; and order of said court entered on or about February 8, 1988, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion to reargue, unaimously affirmed, without costs.

Neither this determination, nor the holding below, will serve to bar, on ground of res judicata or otherwise, the related action brought by plaintiff-appellant to recover $50,000 from defendants-respondents. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Andrew Tyler, J.), entered on or about December 21,1987, which, inter alia, granted defendants-respondents’ cross motion to dismiss the complaint for failure to state a cause of action; and order of said court entered on or about February 8, 1988, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff-appellant’s motion to reargue, unaimously affirmed, without costs.

Neither this determination, nor the holding below, will serve to bar, on ground of res judicata or otherwise, the related action brought by plaintiff-appellant to recover $50,000 from defendants-respondents. Concur — Sullivan, J. P., Asch, Kassal and Ellerin, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 A.D.2d 426, 538 N.Y.S.2d 982, 1989 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/porotsky-v-seroush-nyappdiv-1989.