PORK v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

PORK v. State

345 S.W.3d 402, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2011 WL 3586570

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 16, 2011·No. ED 95634·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*403 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrell Pork (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying, without evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*403 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrell Pork (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Louis County denying, without evidentiary hearing, his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

PORK v. State, 345 S.W.3d 402, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 1061, 2011 WL 3586570 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

345 S.W.3d 402 (PORK v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related